Premium
Recuperación de Patrones del Sotobosque Herbáceo y su Uso como Indicadores de Regeneración del Bosque Deciduo
Author(s) -
McLachlan Stephane M.,
Bazely Dawn R.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
conservation biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.2
H-Index - 222
eISSN - 1523-1739
pISSN - 0888-8892
DOI - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.98145.x
Subject(s) - understory , species richness , deciduous , ecology , seed dispersal , introduced species , vegetation (pathology) , biology , biological dispersal , plant community , geography , habitat , species diversity , native plant , canopy , medicine , population , demography , pathology , sociology
Habitat fragmentation has reduced the richness of native species of forests in northeastern North America. Despite recent large‐scale increases in forest cover, studies indicate that understory herbaceous plant communities may take many decades to recover. We studied recovery patterns of vegetation following up to 35 years of forest regeneration in restored former cottage and road sites at Point Pelée National Park, Ontario, Canada, to assess the vulnerability of the understory herbaceous species. Overall, there were no significant differences in the diversity of native species between restored and relatively undisturbed reference sites. There was, however, significant among‐site variation in the composition of the native species component of these plant communities. When only restored sites were examined, variation in native species composition was associated with time since site restoration, soil moisture, canopy cover, and distance to continuous forest. Native species were assigned vulnerability rankings according to their relative occurrence in reference and restored sites. Spring‐flowering herbs, with ant‐ or gravity‐dispersed seeds, were absent from restored sites and were defined as highly vulnerable. In contrast, summer‐ and fall‐flowering herbs, with vertebrate‐ and wind‐dispersed seeds, dominated restored sites and were less vulnerable. Species of low and intermediate vulnerability had colonized restored sites successfully, and the latter should function as indicators of recovery. In contrast, species with high vulnerability rankings had not recovered at all and, because of their limited dispersal ranges, may recolonize restored sites only if they are actively reintroduced.