Premium
New visual rating system for medial temporal lobe atrophy: a simple diagnostic tool for routine examinations
Author(s) -
KANEKO Tomoki,
KANEKO Kikuko,
MATSUSHITA Mina,
KADOYA Masumi,
IHARA Nobumaro,
RYOKAWA Akiko,
OGIHARA Tomomi,
INUZUKA Shin,
UEDA Hitoshi
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
psychogeriatrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.647
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1479-8301
pISSN - 1346-3500
DOI - 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2011.00390.x
Subject(s) - atrophy , coronal plane , temporal lobe , fluid attenuated inversion recovery , parahippocampal gyrus , medicine , kappa , hippocampus , inter rater reliability , rating scale , psychology , audiology , nuclear medicine , radiology , pathology , magnetic resonance imaging , neuroscience , developmental psychology , mathematics , geometry , epilepsy
Aim: We estimated the usefulness of our new scale to rate medial temporal atrophy with short inversion time inversion recovery images. Methods: Alzheimer's disease (AD) subjects ( n = 34) and non‐demented subjects ( n = 19) were recruited for this study. First, coronal short inversion time inversion recovery images were scanned vertical to the long axis of hippocampus. Next, the single image in which peduncles appeared widest was adopted for estimation. The parahippocampal cerebrospinal fluid space was divided into three parts: the outer, upper and inner parts. The hippocampus was defined as a structure being of equal intensity to grey matter. Two radiologists compared each part of the parahippocampal cerebrospinal fluid space with the hippocampus and rated them on a 0–3 scale. Interrater and intrarater kappa statistics and sensitivity/specificity for the diagnosis of AD were calculated using the scores of the right, left and both sides combined. Results: There were no significant differences between AD and ND subjects with regards to sex. AD subjects had lower Mini‐Mental State Examination scores and were older than non‐demented subjects. Interrater and intrarater kappa statistics were 0.52–0.68 and 0.76–0.83, respectively. Sensitivity was 88.2% using the scores of both sides. Conclusions: Interrater and intrarater agreements were fair to good and good to excellent, respectively. Our new visual rating method detected medial temporal atrophy in AD patients at a highly sensitive rate. As such, we conclude that this visual rating scale is useful for judging medial temporal atrophy simply and objectively in clinical use, and it is helpful in establishing an AD diagnosis.