Premium
Underutilization of Laparoscopic Oophorectomy
Author(s) -
Wood Carl,
Maher Peter,
O'Callaghan David,
Hailey David,
Downing Bruce
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
australian and new zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.734
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1479-828X
pISSN - 0004-8666
DOI - 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1996.tb03285.x
Subject(s) - laparotomy , medicine , oophorectomy , laparoscopy , general surgery , medical record , surgery , retrospective cohort study , hysterectomy
The objective of this study was to compare the use and effectiveness of laparoscopic and laparotomy oophorectomy in 3 hospitals in Melbourne. A retrospective analysis was made of medical records of 140 patients having laparoscopic or laparotomy oophorectomy in the Mercy Hospital for Women (41), Monash Medical Centre (37), and Cliveden Hill Private Hospital (62). Both public hospitals used the laparoscopic procedure, 12% and 22% respectively, less often than the private hospital, 94%. The average number of hospital days for procedures completed by laparoscopy was 1.3 and for laparotomy 6.9. Fourteen percent of laparoscopic procedures were converted to laparotomy. Adjusting for this the average hospital stay was 1.6 days for procedures started laparoscopically. Assuming 1,000 oophorectomies are performed each year in Australia of which 80% could be performed laparoscopically, there may be cost savings to health care providers of over $1.5 million. Laparoscopic oophorectomy is a safe, effective and cost‐efficient method of removing the ovary and gynaecologists should be encouraged to learn and perform this procedure.