Premium
Peritoneal Surgery in the Treatment of Endometriosis‐Excision or Thermal Ablation?
Author(s) -
Wood C.,
Maher P.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
australian and new zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.734
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1479-828X
pISSN - 0004-8666
DOI - 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1996.tb03284.x
Subject(s) - endometriosis , medicine , ablation , thermal ablation , surgery
Summary: Twenty patients with Stage 2 to 4 endometriosis were referred to an Endometriosis Clinic with an average of 3.4 previous medical and surgical treatments. All were treated by peritoneal excision. Follow‐up was for 9–36 months and 14 had a further laparoscope Seventeen of 20 patients are free of symptoms. In 1 patient recurrence occurred in a separate site and in 2 there were lesions close to the original lesion in the pouch of Douglas and bladder wall. In addition, I of the 14 patients having further laparoscopy had mild adhesions. The satisfactory results of the study suggest that a controlled trial comparing peritoneal excision and thermal ablation is worthwhile. There are considerable theoretical advantages in using peritoneal excision rather than peritoneal thermal ablation.