Premium
Presacral Neurectomy ‐ A Reappraisal
Author(s) -
FHegner John R. H.,
Umstad Mark P.
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
australian and new zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.734
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1479-828X
pISSN - 0004-8666
DOI - 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1991.tb02771.x
Subject(s) - medicine , endometriosis , pelvic pain , surgery , pelvis , neurectomy , gynecology , alternative medicine , pathology
Summary: Between April 1984 and April 1990, 20 patients with a mean age of 27.9 years underwent presacral neurectomy at The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. Overall, 11 of the 19 patients (58%) assessable for follow‐up were totally cured of pain and 8 (42%) were partially cured. The most common indication for presacral neurectomy was secondary dysmenorrhoea, usually in association with endometriosis or pelvic adhesions. In 4 patients with uterine dysmenorrhoea not associated with pelvic pathology the operation produced a complete cure. The general consensus of gynaecological opinion is that presacral neurectomy should still be reserved for a limited number of carefully selected patients in whom other methods of treatment have been exhausted. It is imperative that a prior psychological assessment should be undertaken whenever a functional component is suspected. Whilst pain of uterine origin may be cured by presacral neurectomy, lateral pelvic pain of adnexal origin requires ovarian sympathectomy.