Premium
A nurse‐led intensive care after‐care programme – development, experiences and preliminary evaluation
Author(s) -
Samuelson Karin AM,
Corrigan Ingrid
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
nursing in critical care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.689
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 1478-5153
pISSN - 1362-1017
DOI - 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2009.00336.x
Subject(s) - medicine , intensive care unit , intensive care , nursing , scale (ratio) , critical care nursing , distress , next of kin , family medicine , intensive care medicine , health care , history , economic growth , clinical psychology , physics , archaeology , quantum mechanics , economics
Background: The benefits of critical care follow‐up services include increased understanding of the long‐term consequences of intensive care and entail helping patients and their next of kin to come to terms with their problems and distress following critical illness and intensive care treatment. Aims: To establish an intensive care after‐care programme and to conduct a preliminary evaluation of the follow‐up service from the patients' and relatives' perspectives in a general intensive care unit (ICU) in Sweden. Design: A descriptive and evaluative design was used, and data from the first year of the after‐care programme were collected. The final programme was nurse led and included five main points; a patient diary with colour photographs, ward visits, a patient information pamphlet, a follow‐up consultation 2–3 months after intensive care discharge and feedback to the ICU staff. An evaluation questionnaire was handed out to patients and next of kin attending the follow‐up clinic, e.g. asking the respondents to rate their satisfaction of the consultation on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: The first year of after‐care statistics showed that 170 survivors with a stay of 48 h or more were discharged from the ICU, resulting in 190 ward visits and 79 follow‐up consultations. The preliminary evaluation revealed that the 2‐month follow‐up consultation achieved a median VAS rating of 9·8 (ranging from 1 to 10, poor to excellent) from both patients and next of kin. Conclusion: The development and preliminary evaluation of this nurse‐led intensive care programme resulted in a feasible programme, requiring modest resources, with a high level of patient and relative satisfaction. Relevance to clinical practice: This paper attempts to share with professional colleagues important steps during the developmental process of establishing an intensive care follow‐up service and presents the content and preliminary evaluation of a nurse‐led intensive care after‐care programme focusing on the patients' and relatives' perspectives.