Premium
Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen‐positive hepatitis B treatment: meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
Author(s) -
Rudin Dan,
Shah Sooraj M.,
Kiss Alexander,
Wetz Robert V.,
Sottile Vincent M.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
liver international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.873
H-Index - 110
eISSN - 1478-3231
pISSN - 1478-3223
DOI - 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01580.x
Subject(s) - lamivudine , medicine , hbeag , pegylated interferon , gastroenterology , odds ratio , seroconversion , confidence interval , hepatitis b , interferon , randomized controlled trial , combination therapy , immunology , hepatitis b virus , hbsag , chronic hepatitis , virus , ribavirin
Aims: To compare interferon monotherapy with its combination with lamivudine for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐positive hepatitis B treatment. Methods: Two independent researchers identified pertinent randomized controlled trials. The trials were evaluated for methodological quality and heterogeneity. Rates of sustained virological and biochemical responses, and HBeAg clearance and seroconversion were used as primary efficacy measures. Quantitative meta‐analyses were conducted to assess differences between groups for conventional and pegylated interferon, and overall. Results: Greater sustained virological, biochemical and seroconversion rates were observed with addition of lamivudine to conventional [odds ratio (OR)=3.1, 95% confidence intervals (CI) (1.7–5.5), P <0.0001, OR=1.8, 95% CI (1.2–2.7), P =0.007 and OR=1.8, 95% CI (1.1–2.8), P =0.01 respectively], although not pegylated [OR=1.1, 95% CI (0.5–2.3), P =0.8, OR=1.0, 95% CI (0.7–1.3), P =0.94, and OR=0.9, 95% CI (0.6–1.2), P =0.34 respectively] interferon‐α, with no significant affect on HBeAg clearance rates [OR=1.6, 95% CI (0.9–2.7), P =0.09, and OR=0.8, 95% CI (0.6–1.1), P =0.26 respectively]. Excluding virological response ( P <0.001), pegylated interferon monotherapy and conventional interferon and lamivudine combination therapy were similarly efficacious ( P >0.05), with the former studied in harder to treat patients, as evidenced by the superior virological response observed with conventional as compared with pegylated interferon monotherapy ( P <0.0001). Conclusion: In comparable populations, pegylated interferon monotherapy is likely to be equally or more efficacious than conventional interferon and lamivudine combination therapy, thus constituting the treatment of choice, with no added benefit with lamivudine addition. However, when conventional interferon is used, its combination with lamivudine should be considered.