Premium
Early treatment response predicts the need for liver transplantation in autoimmune hepatitis
Author(s) -
Tan Patrick,
Marotta Paul,
Ghent Cameron,
Adams Paul
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
liver international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.873
H-Index - 110
eISSN - 1478-3231
pISSN - 1478-3223
DOI - 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2005.01121.x
Subject(s) - medicine , immunosuppression , liver transplantation , autoimmune hepatitis , gastroenterology , complete response , odds ratio , transplantation , hepatitis , chemotherapy
Background: The need for immunosuppression in autoimmune hepatitis is established. Previous studies have investigated short‐term outcomes in patients who respond to treatment. This study assesses long‐term prognosis of patients who fail to respond to standard immunosuppression. Methods: 163 charts were reviewed, composed of 108 non‐transplant patients and 55 patients who required liver transplantation (LT). Clinical endpoints were based on aminotransaminases: Early treatment response (ER) was a 50% improvement at 6 months of therapy, Complete remission (CR) was an improvement to <2X normal, Relapse was worsening to >3X normal, Incomplete response (IR) was some response but no CR in 3 years, and No response (NR) was no improvement after 3 years. Results: 85% of non‐LT and 25% of LT patients achieved ER, 91% of non‐LT and 26% of LT patients achieved CR. 41% of non‐LT patients relapsed on maintenance treatment, and 41% of non‐LT patients relapsed when withdrawn from treatment. 9% of non‐LT and 58% of LT patients had IR. 16% in LT group showed NR, while all non‐LT patients showed some response. All paired comparisons were statistically different ( P <0.05). Multiple regression analysis revealed that lack of ER predicts need for LT ( P =0.0005). 87% of patients who achieved ER did not require LT, whereas 16% of patients who failed ER showed NR and all required LT. Odds ratio of a patient who failed ER proceeding to LT, compared to a patient who achieved ER, was 16.8 (7.5 to 37.7, 95% CI). Conclusion: Patients who fail to show a 50% improvement in transaminases at 6 months of standard immunosuppression should be considered for alternate treatment modalities or be referred earlier for LT.