Premium
Corruption in Africa – Part 1
Author(s) -
Mbaku John Mukum
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
history compass
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.121
H-Index - 1
ISSN - 1478-0542
DOI - 10.1111/j.1478-0542.2009.00633.x
Subject(s) - independence (probability theory) , colonialism , corporate governance , language change , empowerment , poverty , political economy , political science , development economics , democracy , metropolitan area , destiny (iss module) , politics , economic growth , sociology , business , economics , geography , law , art , statistics , physics , mathematics , literature , archaeology , finance , astronomy
As Africans struggled against colonial exploitation, there was near universal agreement among the freedom fighters and other nationalists that one of the most important determinants of poverty in the colonies was the control of the instruments of economic and political governance by foreign interlopers, all of whose objectives were in conflict with those of the Africans. Colonial institutional arrangements were primarily instruments for the exploitation of Africans and their resources. Europeans came to Africa to maximize metropolitan objectives and hence, established within each colony, institutional arrangements that enhanced their ability to exploit Africans and their resources for the benefit of the metropolitan economies. With their comparative advantage in the employment of military and police force, the Europeans were able to impose on the African colonies laws and institutions that enhanced their objectives but significantly impoverished Africans. Hence, independence was considered critical not only to the elimination of the psychological effects of foreign occupation but also to the empowerment of Africans and the enhancement of their ability to take full control of their governance systems. First, independence was expected to expel the European interlopers from the continent and allow the in‐coming African leaders to rid their societies of the exploitative, despotic and non‐democratic institutions that had been brought to the colonies by the Europeans. In the post‐independence period, Africans were expected to have full control of their own destiny, allocate their own resources, and generally take responsibility for the design and implementation of policies affecting their own welfare. Second, the new leaders were then expected to engage all relevant stakeholder groups in each country in democratic constitution making to develop and adopt locally focused, participatory, inclusive and politically and economically relevant institutional arrangements. Finally, Africa’s post‐independence leaders were expected to use public policy as an instrument for the effective eradication of mass poverty and deprivation.