Premium
Empire and the Visual Representation of Nature, 1860–1960 1
Author(s) -
Beinart William,
Hughes Lotte
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
history compass
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.121
H-Index - 1
ISSN - 1478-0542
DOI - 10.1111/j.1478-0542.2008.00530.x
Subject(s) - indigenous , representation (politics) , possession (linguistics) , empire , visual culture , power (physics) , style (visual arts) , variety (cybernetics) , nationalism , aesthetics , history , focus (optics) , visual arts , sociology , art , law , political science , computer science , politics , ancient history , artificial intelligence , philosophy , linguistics , ecology , physics , optics , quantum mechanics , biology
In this article, we explore some of the images transmitted about the landscapes and environments of the British empire, largely during the century after 1860. While our major focus is on British‐based representations, some reference is made to artistic work elsewhere that fed into the imperial visual store. As a number of scholars have argued, some visual materials familiarized British audiences with far‐flung conquered zones and naturalized their exploitation. However, these images were only one style of representation; there were many others and it is important to identify some of the complexity and variety of visual imaginations, developed in many different media. Settler and indigenous art and photography used images from nature to develop nationalist and indigenous reassertions. Images could transcend their intended purpose, and, as in the case of approaches to nature itself, there were contending voices. Jostling alongside images that celebrated exploitation and possession of colonized territories, there were others that championed nature or portrayed it sympathetically. Because of the power of visual media, these had a significant influence on conservationist thinking.