Premium
Do Differences in the Scale of Irrigation Projects Generate Different Impacts on Poverty and Production?
Author(s) -
Dillon Andrew
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of agricultural economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.157
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1477-9552
pISSN - 0021-857X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00276.x
Subject(s) - counterfactual thinking , agricultural economics , irrigation , economics , consumption (sociology) , production (economics) , agriculture , poverty , impact evaluation , scale (ratio) , per capita , propensity score matching , welfare , agricultural productivity , natural resource economics , economic growth , geography , mathematics , microeconomics , market economy , ecology , social science , philosophy , statistics , population , demography , cartography , archaeology , epistemology , sociology , biology
This article investigates differences in household production and consumption among small‐ and large‐scale irrigators to assess whether the scale of an irrigation project increases household welfare in Mali. Much of the evidence of the impact of irrigation does not use counterfactual analysis to estimate such impact or distinguish between the scale of the irrigation projects to be evaluated. In the dataset collected by the author, both a large‐scale irrigation project and small‐scale projects are used to construct counterfactual groups. Propensity score matching is used to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated for small and large irrigators relative to non‐irrigators on agricultural production, agricultural income and consumption per capita. Small‐scale irrigation has a larger effect on agricultural production and agricultural income than large‐scale irrigation, but large‐scale irrigation has a larger effect on consumption per capita. This suggests that market integration and non‐farm externalities are important in realising gains in agricultural surplus from irrigation.