Premium
Alosetron, cilansetron and tegaserod modify mesenteric but not colonic blood flow in rats
Author(s) -
Painsipp Evelin,
Shahbazian Anaid,
Holzer Peter
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00392.x
Subject(s) - tegaserod , medicine , blood flow , irritable bowel syndrome
Background and purpose: As the use of the 5‐HT 3 receptor antagonist alosetron (GlaxoSmithKline) and the 5‐HT 4 receptor agonist tegaserod (Novartis) in patients with irritable bowel syndrome has been associated with cases of ischaemic colitis, the effects of alosetron, cilansetron (Solvay) and tegaserod on the rat splanchnic circulation were evaluated. Experimental approach: Phenobarbital‐anaesthetised rats were instrumented to record blood flow in the superior mesenteric artery and transverse colon and to calculate mesenteric and colonic vascular conductance. Key results: Intravenous alosetron (0.03–0.3 mg·kg −1 ) did not alter blood pressure or heart rate but reduced mesenteric blood flow and vascular conductance by 15–20%. This activity profile was also seen after intraduodenal alosetron and shared by the 5‐HT 3 receptor antagonist cilansetron. In contrast, blood flow, vascular conductance and intraluminal pressure in the colon were not modified by alosetron and cilansetron. Intravenous or intraduodenal tegaserod (0.3–1.0 mg·kg −1 ) had no inhibitory effect on mesenteric and colonic blood flow. Peroral treatment of rats with alosetron or tegaserod for 7 days did not modify mesenteric haemodynamics at baseline and after blockade of nitric oxide synthesis. Mild inflammation induced by dextran sulphate sodium failed to provoke a vasoconstrictor effect of cilansetron in the colon. Conclusions and implications: Alosetron and cilansetron, not tegaserod, caused a small and transient constriction of the rat mesenteric vascular bed, whereas blood flow in the colon remained unaltered. The relevance of these findings to the treatment‐associated occurrence of ischaemic colitis in patients with irritable bowel syndrome remains open.