Premium
Effects of cyclopiazonic acid and thapsigargin on electromechanical activities and intracellular Ca 2+ in smooth muscle of carotid artery of hypertensive rats
Author(s) -
Sekiguchi F.,
Shimamura K.,
Akashi M.,
Sunano S.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15478.x
Subject(s) - cyclopiazonic acid , thapsigargin , medicine , intracellular , endocrinology , extracellular , muscle tension , chemistry , tonic (physiology) , verapamil , endoplasmic reticulum , muscle contraction , membrane potential , vascular smooth muscle , biophysics , calcium , biology , smooth muscle , biochemistry , physical medicine and rehabilitation
1 The effects of cyclopiazonic acid (CPA) and thapsigargin (TG), both of which are known to inhibit sarcoplasmic reticular Ca 2+ ‐ATPase, on the mechanical activities, intracellular Ca 2+ level and electrical activities of smooth muscle of the carotid artery of stroke‐prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP) and Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY) were compared. 2 Both CPA and TG induced elevation of tension of the smooth muscle, which was composed of a phasic and a tonic component. The level of tension attained, especially the tonic component, was greater in the preparation from SHRSP. 3 The elevation of tension was associated with an increased intracellular Ca 2+ level. Both the elevation of tension and the increase in intracellular Ca 2+ were diminished by the removal of extracellular Ca 2+ or by the application of verapamil. 4 The resting membrane potential of the preparations from SHRSP were depolarized to a greater extent than those from WKY. CPA depolarized the smooth muscle from both SHRSP and WKY, and the final level was also more depolarized in the preparation from SHRSP. 5 These results indicate that the elevation of tension induced by these drugs is mainly due to increased Ca 2+ influx through voltage‐dependent Ca 2+ channels, and the difference in the action between the preparation from SHRSP and that from WKY can be explained mainly by the changes in the channels. 6 Thus, differences in the action of these drugs on the tension of smooth muscle between preparations from WKY and SHRSP can mainly be explained by the difference in the membrane potential which is related to the difference in voltage‐dependent Ca 2+ influx.