Premium
Anaesthetic modulation of nicotinic ion channel kinetics in bovine chromaffin cells
Author(s) -
Charlesworth P.,
Richards C.D.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb13290.x
Subject(s) - chemistry , etomidate , nicotinic agonist , patch clamp , ion channel , acetylcholine receptor , carbachol , biophysics , acetylcholine , nicotinic acetylcholine receptor , pharmacology , receptor , biochemistry , medicine , biology , propofol
1 We have investigated the action of the anaesthetics methoxyflurane, methohexitone and etomidate on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channel of bovine adrenal chromaffin cells using the whole cell patch clamp technique. 2 Spectral analysis of macroscopic currents evoked by 25 μ m carbachol revealed that each of the agents tested reduced the lifetime of the channel open state in a dose‐dependent manner. The whole cell current was inhibited in a concentration‐dependent fashion by each agent. 3 Channel gating parameters were calculated from single channel studies and the results used to test models explaining the modulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channels by anaesthetics. 4 Each of the agents studied reduced the mean channel open time in a concentration‐dependent manner. Anaesthetic concentrations reducing mean open time by 50% were: 370 μ m methoxyflurane, 30 μ m methohexitone or 23 μ m etomidate. 5 Methohexitone and etomidate produced an increase in the number of brief closures within bursts, while no such increase was observed with methoxyflurane. Despite these inter‐burst gaps, mean burst length was reduced by each of the agents tested. 6 It is concluded that a simple sequential blocking model fails to account for the action of these anaesthetics. An extended model, in which blocked channels can close, may be applicable.