Premium
Regional haemodynamic effects of dopamine and its prodrugs l ‐dopa and gludopa in the rat and in the glycerol‐treated rat as a model for acute renal failure
Author(s) -
Drieman J.C.,
Kan F.J.P.M.,
Thijssen H.H.W.,
Essen H.,
Smits J.F.M.,
Boudier H.A.J. Struijker
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1994.tb14860.x
Subject(s) - renal blood flow , vasoconstriction , dopamine , vasodilation , prodrug , kidney , vascular resistance , glycerol , chemistry , endocrinology , medicine , pharmacology , blood pressure , hemodynamics , blood flow , biochemistry
1 In this study the renal selectivity of dopamine and its prodrugs l ‐dopa and gludopa, with respect to their effects on regional blood flow, vascular resistance and central haemodynamics was investigated in normal rats and in rats with glycerol‐induced acute renal failure (ARF). 2 In normal, anaesthetized rats, dopamine as well as its prodrugs caused a dose‐dependent reduction of vascular resistance in the kidney (RR), mesentery (MR) and hindquarters (HQR) (dose range: dopamine: 0.1–5 μmol kg −1 h −1 ; l ‐dopa and gludopa: 1–200 μmol kg −1 h −1 ). Blood pressure and heart rate were affected at the highest dose only. 3 Administration of glycerol induced a preferential renal vasoconstriction; renal blood flow (– 60%) and vascular resistance (+ 190%) were significantly more affected than MR (+ 40%) and HQR (+ 60%). This was only ameliorated by a low rate (10 μmol kg −1 h −1 ) infusion of gludopa: the glycerol‐induced reduction of renal flow and increase in RR were significantly attenuated. A high dose of gludopa (100 μmol kg −1 h −1 ) or any dose of l ‐dopa or dopamine did not induce this beneficial effect. The glycerol‐induced increase in MR and HQR was not attenuated by any of the treatments used. 4 The results indicate that gludopa is not renally selective at a pharmacodynamic level in normal, anaesthetized rats. Contrary to this, a low dose of gludopa does cause a renal selective vasodilatation and reduction of RR in rats with glycerol‐induced ARF. This difference could be explained by a difference in renal vascular tone between normal rats and glycerol‐induced ARF rats. A high dose of gludopa does not cause these renal‐selective effects: renal resistance and renal flow are at the same level as following glycerol and saline. This is probably due to the systemic effects of the released dopamine.