z-logo
Premium
Characterization of NK 1 and NK 2 tachykinin receptors in guinea‐pig and rat bronchopulmonary and vascular systems
Author(s) -
Floch Anne,
Fardin Véronique,
Cavero Icilio
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1994.tb14803.x
Subject(s) - tachykinin receptor , receptor , guinea pig , neurokinin a , radioligand , medicine , endocrinology , biology , bronchus , lung , substance p , neuropeptide , respiratory disease
1 NK 1 and NK 2 tachykinin receptors were characterized in guinea‐pig and rat bronchopulmonary systems and in the vasculature of the rat by use of radioligand binding and/or functional studies. 2 The radioligands for NK 1 and NK 2 receptors ([ 3 H]‐SP and [ 3 H]‐pNKA, respectively) did not label tachykinin receptors in homogenates of rat lungs or bronchi. In contrast, in the guinea‐pig, [ 3 H]‐SP bound with high affinity to these tissues ( K D = 0.23 ± 0.08 n m and 0.34 ± 0.05 n m , for lungs and bronchi, respectively). The total number of binding sites was 4.6 fold greater in bronchus ( B max = 135 ± 27 fmol mg −1 protein) than in lung homogenates ( B max = 29.3 ± 0.1 fmol mg −1 protein). Furthermore, this binding was markedly displaced by CP‐96,345 (p K i = 9.5 ± 0.1) and RP 67580 (p K i = 7.6 ± 0.1), antagonists of NK 1 receptors, slightly displaced by SR 48968 (p K i = 6.6 ± 0.1), but not affected by actinomycin D or L‐659,877, antagonists of NK 2 receptors. Specific binding of [ 3 H]‐pNKA, detected in guinea‐pig bronchi ( K D = 5.2 ± 0.1 n m , and B max = 203 ± 19 fmol mg −1 protein) but not in lungs, was similarly (40 to 53%) displaced by RP 67580 (1 μ m ), CP‐96,345 (10 and 100 n m ) or SR 48968 (10 and 100 n m ). The displacement approximately doubled (87 to 91%) when SR 48968 (10 n m ) was combined with either RP 67580 (1 μ m ) or CP‐96,345 (10 n m ), but not when RP 67580 was combined with CP‐96,345. 3 In urethane‐anaesthetized guinea‐pigs, i.v. injections of the NK 1 receptor agonists SP, [Pro 9 ]‐SP, [Sar 9 , Met(O 2 ) 11 ]‐SP and septide, as well as the NK 2 receptor agonists NKA and [Lys 5 , MeLeu 9 , NLeu 10 ]‐NKA (4–10) (0.1–10 μg kg −1 , i.v.), dose‐dependently increased lung inflation pressure. The most potent of these peptides were septide and [Lys 5 , MeLeu 9 , NLeu 10 ]‐NKA (4–10) (EC 50 = 0.38 ± 0.07 and 0.07 ± 0.02 μg kg −1 , respectively). Interestingly, septide was 130 fold less potent than SP in displacing [ 3 H]‐SP from its binding sites in the guinea‐pig lung, whereas it was 14 fold more potent than SP as a bronchoconstrictor. RP 67580 (0.3–5 mg kg −1 , i.v.) and CP‐96,345 (0.01–3 mg kg −1 , i.v.) dose‐dependently reduced the bronchoconstriction produced by the NK 1 receptor agonists. Conversely, the NK 2 receptor antagonists actinomycin D (1–10 mg kg −1 , i.v.) and SR 48968 (0.03–0.3 mg kg −1 , i.v.) inhibited specifically the responses induced by NK 2 receptor agonists. 4 In pentobarbitone‐anaesthetized rats, the NK 1 and NK 2 receptor agonists (0.01–4 μg kg −1 , i.v.) produced dose‐dependent hypotensive responses. The order of potency was SP = [Sar 9 , Met(O 2 ) 11 ]‐SP = [Pro9]‐SP > septide = NKA >[Lys 5 , MeLeu 9 , NLeu 10 ]‐NKA (4–10) . RP 67580 (0.13–0.5 mg kg −1 , i.v.) and CP‐96,345 (0.5–2 mg kg −1 , i.v.) antagonized in a dose‐related manner (20 to 64%) the vascular effects of both NK 1 and NK 2 receptor agonists, whereas actinomycin D (3 mg kg −1 , i.v.) and SR 48968 (2 mg kg −1 , i.v.) did not. RP 67580 was approximately 4 times more potent than CP‐96,345. 5 These studies indicate that NK 1 and NK 2 receptors are both present in the guinea‐pig bronchopulmonary system whereas only NK 1 receptors are detectable in the rat vasculature under our experimental conditions. Furthermore, NK 1 receptors in the guinea‐pig bronchopulmonary system are pharmacologically distinct from those present in the rat vascular system, since both agonist potencies and antagonist affinities differ between the two species.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here