z-logo
Premium
Inhibition of noradrenaline release by ω‐conotoxin GVIA in the rat tail artery
Author(s) -
Clasbrummel B.,
Osswald H.,
Illes P.
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1989.tb11789.x
Subject(s) - vasoconstriction , endocrinology , medicine , stimulation , chemistry , ic50 , biology , in vitro , biochemistry
1 The perivascular nerves of isolated tail arteries from Wistar rats were stimulated with field pulses (1Hz, 2 pulses, every 2 min). ω‐Conotoxin 10 nmol l −1 depressed neurogenically mediated contractions, but did not influence the contractions to noradrenaline 0.1–0.3 μmol 1 −1 . 2 The inhibitory effect of ω‐conotoxin was concentration‐dependent (IC 50 = 3.8 nmol l −1 ). It did not reach a steady‐state during 30 min incubation and could not be reversed upon subsequent washout for another 60 min. 3 A gradual increase in the Ca 2+ concentration of the medium from 1.25 mmol l −1 to 10 mmol 1 −1 enhanced vasoconstriction and attenuated the action of ω‐conotoxin 10 nmol l −1 . When a low stimulation intensity (120 mA) was used at high external Ca 2+ (10 mmol l −1 ), similar contractile responses were obtained as under normal conditions (200mA current, 2.5 mmol l −1 Ca 2+ ). However, the inverse relationship between the effect of the toxin and external Ca 2+ remained unchanged. 4 The time‐course and degree of the inhibition by ω‐conotoxin 3 nmol l −1 was identical in tail arteries of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and their normotensive controls (WKY). 5 When tail arteries of Wistar rats were preincubated with [ 3 H]‐noradrenaline, field stimulation (0.4 Hz, 24 pulses, every 16 min) evoked tritium overflow and vasoconstriction. ω‐Conotoxin 30 nmol l −1 inhibited both responses to a similar extent. 6 Our results suggest that ω‐conotoxin selectively blocks Ca 2+ channels in the terminals of perivascular nerves and thereby reduces the release, but not the contractile effect of the sympathetic transmitter.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here