z-logo
Premium
ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTS OF VASOACTIVE INTESTINAL PEPTIDE (VIP) ON BLOOD FLOW THROUGH AND SALIVATION OF THE DOG SALIVARY GLAND IN COMPARISON WITH THOSE OF SECRETIN, GLUCAGON AND ACETYLCHOLINE
Author(s) -
SHIMIZU T.,
TAIRA N.
Publication year - 1979
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1979.tb07882.x
Subject(s) - secretin , vasoactive intestinal peptide , endocrinology , medicine , acetylcholine , vasodilation , tachyphylaxis , submandibular gland , atropine , saliva , chemistry , neuropeptide , pancreas , receptor
1 The vascular bed of the submandibular gland in situ was perfused with blood through the glandular artery at a constant pressure in anaesthetized dogs. All drugs were administered intra‐arterially. 2 Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), secretin and acetylcholine produced a dose‐dependent increase in blood flow through the artery (vasodilatation) but glucagon was almost ineffective. 3 Dose‐blood flow response curves for VIP and secretin were parallel, and VIP was about 100 times as potent as secretin on a molar basis. Dose‐blood flow response curves for acetylcholine were flatter than those for VIP and secretin. Acetylcholine was approximately as potent as secretin on a molar basis. 4 No tachyphylaxis developed to the vasodilator action of VIP. 5 The vasodilator responses to VIP and to electrical stimulation of the chordolingual nerve were scarcely modified by (—)‐hyoscyamine in doses that fully antagonized the vasodilator response to acetylcholine. 6 VIP, secretin and glucagon were ineffective in eliciting salivary secretion. 7 The possibility that VIP is released from parasympathetic vasodilator nerves and mediates the atropine‐resistant vasodilatation in the dog submandibular gland is discussed.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here