Premium
Three Kinds of Anti‐Intellectualism: Rethinking Hofstadter *
Author(s) -
Rigney Daniel
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
sociological inquiry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.446
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1475-682X
pISSN - 0038-0245
DOI - 10.1111/j.1475-682x.1991.tb00172.x
Subject(s) - intellectualism , sociology , unitary state , phenomenon , rationalism , epistemology , elitism , philosophy , law , political science , politics
Hofstadter's landmark analysis of anti‐intellectualism in American life is interpreted within the framework of the sociology of knowledge. His analysis suggests three analytically distinct types of anti‐intellectualism: religious anti‐rationalism, populist anti‐elitism, and unreflective instrumentalism. Each type arises from within its own distinctive institutional matrix. Although Hofstadter fails to anticipate the growing cultural impact of mass media institutions, he demonstrates convincingly that anti‐intellectualism is not a unitary phenomenon.