Premium
Communication patterns during marital conflict: A cross‐cultural replication
Author(s) -
BODENMANN GUY,
KAISER ANDREA,
HAHLWEG KURT,
FEHMWOLFSDORF GABRIELE
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
personal relationships
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.81
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1475-6811
pISSN - 1350-4126
DOI - 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00176.x
Subject(s) - psychology , dyad , reliability (semiconductor) , replication (statistics) , german , constructive , social psychology , sample (material) , interpersonal communication , empirical research , statistics , computer science , power (physics) , physics , chemistry , mathematics , archaeology , process (computing) , chromatography , quantum mechanics , history , operating system
This study examines the reliability and validity of the Communication Patterns Questionnaire (CPQ) from Christensen and Sullaway (1984). The CPQ is a relatively new questionnaire aimed at assessing marital communication at the dyadic level. It addresses communication patterns involving the behavior of both members of the dyad rather than just one partner. The CPQ permits the evaluation of communication in close relationships on three scales: (a) mutual constructive communication; (b) mutual avoidance of communication; (c) demand/withdrawal. Previous research among American samples has yielded empirical evidence concerning the reliability and validity of this instrument. The current study focuses upon whether the CPQ may also be applied to European subjects. To address this question, a German and a Swiss sample were used. Our results demonstrate that the questionnaire's reliability and validity also prove satisfactory among European samples. In both studies, communication avoidance and withdrawal were negatively correlated with relationship satisfaction.