z-logo
Premium
Can Audit Partners Predict Subordinates' Ability to Detect Errors?
Author(s) -
MESSIER, JR. WILLIAM F.,
OWHOSO VINCENT,
RAKOVSKI CARTER
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of accounting research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.767
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1475-679X
pISSN - 0021-8456
DOI - 10.1111/j.1475-679x.2008.00307.x
Subject(s) - overconfidence effect , audit , psychology , financial statement , accounting , business , social psychology
This study examines audit partners' predictions of the ability of managers and seniors to detect financial statement errors. If partners are unable to predict the ability of their subordinates to detect errors, audit effectiveness may be affected. Audit partners are asked to predict which members of the audit team (managers or seniors) are able to detect specific types of errors. These predictions are then compared to errors detected by managers and seniors that are seeded in working papers. The results show that partners (1) exhibit significant overconfidence in the ability of subordinates to detect errors, (2) are more accurate in predicting managers' performance than seniors, (3) are more accurate at predicting subordinates' ability to detect mechanical (simple) errors than conceptual (complex) errors, and (4) are not better at predicting subordinates' ability to detect more frequent and more important errors than less frequent and less important errors.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here