z-logo
Premium
Health Behaviors and Utilization among Users of Complementary and Alternative Medicine for Treatment versus Health Promotion
Author(s) -
Davis Matthew A.,
West Alan N.,
Weeks William B.,
Sirovich Brenda E.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
health services research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.706
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1475-6773
pISSN - 0017-9124
DOI - 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01270.x
Subject(s) - national health interview survey , health promotion , medicine , obesity , health policy , family medicine , alternative medicine , promotion (chess) , gerontology , environmental health , public health , nursing , population , pathology , politics , political science , law
Objective. To compare the characteristics, health behaviors, and health services utilization of U.S. adults who use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) to treat illness to those who use CAM for health promotion. Data Source. The 2007 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Study Design. We compared adult (age ≥18 years) NHIS respondents based on whether they used CAM in the prior year to treat an illness ( n =973), for health promotion ( n =3,281), or for both purposes ( n =3,031). We used complex survey design methods to make national estimates and examine respondents' self‐reported health status, health behaviors, and conventional health services utilization. Principal Findings. Adults who used CAM for health promotion reported significantly better health status and healthier behaviors overall (higher rates of physical activity and lower rates of obesity) than those who used CAM as treatment. While CAM Users in general had higher rates of conventional health services utilization than those who did not use CAM; adults who used CAM as treatment consumed considerably more conventional health services than those who used it for health promotion. Conclusion. This study suggests that there are two distinct types of CAM User that must be considered in future health services research and policy decisions.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here