Premium
Impact of Generalist Care Managers on Patients with Diabetes
Author(s) -
Dorr David A.,
Wilcox Adam,
Donnelly Steven M.,
Burns Laurie,
Clayton Paul D.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
health services research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.706
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1475-6773
pISSN - 0017-9124
DOI - 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00423.x
Subject(s) - medicine , odds , diabetes mellitus , odds ratio , ambulatory , health care , cohort , ambulatory care , retrospective cohort study , generalist and specialist species , emergency medicine , family medicine , logistic regression , endocrinology , economics , economic growth , ecology , habitat , biology
Objective. To determine how the addition of generalist care managers and collaborative information technology to an ambulatory team affects the care of patients with diabetes. Study Setting. Multiple ambulatory clinics within Intermountain Health Care (IHC), a large integrated delivery network. Study Design. A retrospective cohort study comparing diabetic patients treated by generalist care managers with matched controls was completed. Exposure patients had one or more contacts with a care manager; controls were matched on utilization, demographics, testing, and baseline glucose control. Using role‐specific information technology to support their efforts, care managers assessed patients' readiness for change, followed guidelines, and educated and motivated patients. Data Collection. Patient data collected as part of an electronic patient record were combined with care manager‐created databases to assess timely testing of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) levels and changes in LDL and HbA1c levels. Principal Findings. In a multivariable model, the odds of being overdue for testing for HbA1c decreased by 21 percent in the exposure group ( n =1,185) versus the control group ( n =4,740). The odds of being tested when overdue for HbA1c or LDL increased by 49 and 26 percent, respectively, and the odds of HbA1c <7.0 percent also increased by 19 percent in the exposure group. The average HbA1c levels decreased more in the exposure group than in the controls. The effect on LDL was not significant. Conclusions. Generalist care managers using computer‐supported diabetes management helped increase adherence to guidelines for testing and control of HbA1c levels, leading to improved health status of patients with diabetes.