Premium
Democrats with adjectives: Linking direct and indirect measures of democratic support
Author(s) -
SCHEDLER ANDREAS,
SARSFIELD RODOLFO
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
european journal of political research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.267
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1475-6765
pISSN - 0304-4130
DOI - 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00708.x
Subject(s) - democracy , linkage (software) , politics , identification (biology) , sociology , cluster (spacecraft) , liberal democracy , democratic system , core (optical fiber) , political economy , political science , law , computer science , telecommunications , biochemistry , chemistry , botany , biology , gene , programming language
. Major cross‐national surveys measure popular support for democracy through direct questions about democracy in the abstract. Since people may entertain competing democratic ideas and ideals, however, the academic community ignores the extent to which standard questions capture citizen support for liberal democracy. To solve the validity problems associated with direct measures of democratic support, this article proposes linking them to more concrete, indirect measures of support for democratic principles and institutions. It employs the statistical technique of cluster analysis to establish this linkage. Cluster analysis permits grouping respondents in a way that is open to complex and inconsistent attitudinal profiles. It permits the identification of ‘democrats with adjectives’ who support democracy in the abstract, while rejecting core principles of liberal democracy. The article demonstrates the fruitfulness of this approach by drawing a map of ‘illiberal democrats’ in Mexico on the basis of the country's 2003 National Survey on Political Culture.