Premium
Mongrels or thoroughbreds: A cross‐national look at social security systems
Author(s) -
HELEN BOLDERSON,
MABBETT DEBORAH
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
european journal of political research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.267
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1475-6765
pISSN - 0304-4130
DOI - 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1995.tb00489.x
Subject(s) - social security , diversity (politics) , empirical research , social system , sociology , conjunction (astronomy) , positive economics , computer science , management science , public economics , economics , political science , social science , epistemology , law , philosophy , physics , astronomy , anthropology
. This paper reviews the methodological issues raised by different commentators' attempts to categorise countries' social security systems into ‘regime types’ or ‘models’. It is argued that there are two major problems with these categorisations: (1) the difficulty of finding empirical counterparts to the theoretical concepts used; (2) the complexity of actual social security systems, arising in particular from the diversity of benefits within each system. Despite these problems, we argue that it is possible to maintain a theoretically‐informed approach to the comparative analysis of social security, by adopting a more flexible methodology. The approach presented in this paper identifies some of the main principles on which social security systems are based, specifies their empirical counterparts, and allows each national system to be analysed in terms of its particular conjunction or combination of principles.