Premium
The Take‐Up of Multiple Means‐Tested Benefits by British Pensioners: Evidence from the Family Resources Survey
Author(s) -
HANCOCK RUTH,
PUDNEY STEPHEN,
BARKER GERALDINE,
HERNANDEZ MONICA,
SUTHERLAND HOLLY
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
fiscal studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.63
H-Index - 40
eISSN - 1475-5890
pISSN - 0143-5671
DOI - 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2004.tb00540.x
Subject(s) - entitlement (fair division) , pension , economics , sample (material) , alimony , demographic economics , survey sampling , income tax , stigma (botany) , labour economics , public economics , actuarial science , political science , sociology , finance , law , demography , psychology , population , chemistry , mathematical economics , chromatography , psychiatry
Non‐take‐up of means‐tested benefits among pensioners is of long‐standing concern. It has assumed increased importance from October 2003 with the introduction of the new means‐tested pension credit to which about half of pensioners are expected to be entitled. We use Family Resources Survey data from April 1997 to March 2000 to investigate patterns of pensioner take‐up of income support (IS) (subsequently renamed the minimum income guarantee and now subsumed in pension credit), housing benefit (HB) and council tax benefit (CTB). Although 36 per cent of pensioners in our sample failed to claim their entitlements to at least one of these benefits, only 16 per cent failed to claim amounts worth more than 10 per cent of their disposable income. Generally, take‐up is high where entitlement is high. But there are exceptions which may reflect the claims process and/or a greater degree of social stigma associated with IS than with HB or CTB.