Premium
THE DISTRIBUTION OF YUGOSLAVIA'S NATIONAL INCOME BY SOCIAL CLASSES IN 1938
Author(s) -
Vinski Ivo
Publication year - 1967
Publication title -
review of income and wealth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.024
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1475-4991
pISSN - 0034-6586
DOI - 10.1111/j.1475-4991.1967.tb00746.x
Subject(s) - population , proletariat , economics , distribution (mathematics) , per capita income , agriculture , wage , income distribution , livelihood , per capita , productivity , labour economics , demographic economics , agricultural economics , geography , demography , economic growth , inequality , sociology , political science , mathematics , mathematical analysis , archaeology , politics , law
This paper presents the results of an investigation of the distribution of Yugoslavia's national income by social classes in 1938. The population in mid‐1938 was apportioned among social classes as follows: proletariat 34.6 per cent, middle classes 59.2 per cent, bourgeoisie 5.3 per cent, 0.9 per cent unallocated. About three‐quarters of the population was rural. The proletariat amounted to 5.2 million persons, of which 3 million were peasants living on dwarf holdings and 2.2 million were rural and urban wage earners. Unemployment in the non‐agricultural sector was 10 per cent; if the agricultural sector is added, overall un‐ and under‐employment amounted to 31 per cent. The bourgeoisie consisted of 0.8 million persons, of which two‐fifths were rich peasants. Of the 9 million persons in the middle classes, 7 million were peasants with small and medium holdings. The remainder were mainly minor entrepreneurs in the non‐agricultural sector. The proletariat accounted for 35 per cent of total population but only 18 per cent of aggregate income, whereas the bourgeoisie with 5 per cent of the population received 26 per cent of aggregate income. The distribution of income among the various groups of the non‐agricultural population was more unequal than among the groups of the agricultural population. Estimates are preesented of the distribution of income by various types and sources, for agricultural and non‐agricultural population, together with income per capita, average earnings per employed worker, labor productivity, and capital intensity, the last by industrial branches as well as social classes.