z-logo
Premium
Phosphorus balances for arable soils in Southern England 1986–1999
Author(s) -
Heming S. D.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
soil use and management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.709
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1475-2743
pISSN - 0266-0032
DOI - 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2006.00071.x
Subject(s) - arable land , soil water , fertilizer , topsoil , phosphorus , agronomy , calcareous , straw , organic matter , environmental science , chemistry , zoology , soil science , agriculture , ecology , biology , botany , organic chemistry
The behaviour of P in a range of English arable soils was examined by plotting the change in resin P in the topsoil (ΔPres) at the end of a 3‐ to 5‐year period, against the P balance over the same period (fertilizer P applied minus offtake in crops, estimated from farmers’ reported yields and straw removal). Based on the assumption that values for offtake per tonne of crop yield used for UK arable crops are valid averages, 20–60% of ΔPres was explained by the balance. Applying excess P fertilizer increased Pres, and reducing P fertilizer use decreased it; typically 3–4 kg P ha −1 was required for each mg L −1 ΔPres (6–8 kg ha −1 for each mg L −1 of Olsen P). About half the P balance seems to be resin extractable and this differed little between soil groups, except in cases of very low P (index 0) in which the P buffering was stronger, and on very high P soils (index 4/5) when buffering was less. However, on calcareous soils and red soils, when fertilizer was applied in accord with offtake, Pres fell by up to 4 mg L −1  year −1 (2 mg L −1 yr −1 olsen P) and to prevent this an extra 3–10 kg P ha −1  year −1 fertilizer was required. But on most non‐calcareous soils, replacing offtake maintained Pres, with perhaps slight rises on soils of low clay content or greater organic matter content. In soils under arable rotations, the apparent recovery of P from fertilizer was often around 100%, falling to 85% on Chalk soils and 75% on medium–heavy soils on limestone or Lower Chalk. The fate of the ‘missing’ P needs clarification. The case for corrections to current P fertilizer recommendations in the UK on certain soil types is discussed.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here