Premium
Design of diverter berms for soil erosion control and biorestoration along pipeline rights‐of‐way
Author(s) -
Morgan R.P.C.,
Hann M.J.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
soil use and management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.709
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1475-2743
pISSN - 0266-0032
DOI - 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2005.tb00403.x
Subject(s) - berm , erosion , universal soil loss equation , erosion control , environmental science , vegetation (pathology) , hydrology (agriculture) , soil water , geotechnical engineering , current (fluid) , earthworks , geology , flow (mathematics) , soil science , soil loss , geomorphology , geometry , mathematics , medicine , oceanography , pathology
Diverter berms are used to control soil erosion along restored pipeline corridors between the time the pipe is installed and the establishment of a vegetation cover. Current practice, based on standard design procedures, is often inadequate in areas of steep slopes and erosive rainfall because the resulting berm channels are too steeply graded and too widely spaced, and insufficient attention is given to their outlets. The Universal Soil Loss Equation provides a more flexible procedure for determining the spacing required to achieve a specified erosion target for given conditions of rainfall, soils and slopes. Where the required spacings are not feasible because they are too close, spacings should be based on ensuring that flow velocity does not exceed 80% of the maximum non‐eroding velocity, and additional supporting erosion‐control measures should be provided. Channels should be graded at 0.4% and the grade should never exceed 2%. The choice of type of outlet should be determined by the erodibility of the soil, the steepness of the slope, vegetation cover and whether the outlet slope is on undisturbed or made‐up ground. Broad‐based berms should be used as an alternative to narrow‐based ones where there is a risk of damage from vehicles.