Premium
Objective vs subjective measures of fixation disparity for short and long fixation periods
Author(s) -
Jaschinski Wolfgang,
Jainta Stephanie,
Kloke Wilhelm Bernhard
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
ophthalmic and physiological optics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.147
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1475-1313
pISSN - 0275-5408
DOI - 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00753.x
Subject(s) - fixation (population genetics) , orthodontics , psychology , medicine , environmental health , population
Abstract Purpose: Fixation disparity, i.e. the vergence error for stationary fusion stimuli, can be measured objectively with eye trackers and subjectively with nonius lines. Between these two measures, previous studies found differences that tended to be proportional to the amount of forced vergence, i.e. the discrepancy between vergence and accommodative stimulus. We investigate whether objective and subjective fixation disparity might be similar without forced vergence. Method: We simultaneously measured fixation disparity with the EyeLink II system and with flashed dichoptic nonius lines in 17 subjects who observed targets at a vergence stimulus of 6 deg in an haploscope with 60 cm viewing distance. Results: We found individual differences in objective fixation disparity in a range of about 20 (eso) to −60 (exo) min arc which was considerably larger than the range of subjective fixation disparity. Results were similar for long fixation periods (about 15 s) and short fixation periods (about 1.5 s) between 5 deg saccadic gaze shifts. Further, objective fixation disparity was correlated with objective heterophoria, i.e. the vergence state without a fusion stimulus ( r = 0.8, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Subjective fixation disparity explained only about 25% of the inter‐individual variability in objective fixation disparity. The discrepancy between these two measures might be explained by sensory shifts in retinal correspondence, also in the present condition without forced vergence.