Premium
Usefulness of post‐assessment reports in a paediatric low vision clinic: a questionnaire survey of parents and education professionals
Author(s) -
Len Julie,
Harper Robert,
Lloyd Chris,
Biswas Sus
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
ophthalmic and physiological optics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.147
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1475-1313
pISSN - 0275-5408
DOI - 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00557.x
Subject(s) - terminology , feeling , family medicine , questionnaire , medicine , psychology , optometry , medical education , social psychology , social science , philosophy , linguistics , sociology
This survey aimed to evaluate how helpful parents and those working in the educational setting found written low vision assessment reports. A questionnaire survey was sent to 25 parents and to the corresponding and relevant member of the educational team for each of the 25 children. All were satisfied with the level of information contained in the report and agreed that the report was easy to understand and that the level of explanations given regarding visual function were clear. The main disparities between parents and teaching professionals were concerning the amount of medical terminology used in the report, with only 7% ( n = 1) of those from the educational setting, but 30% ( n = 6) of parents feeling there was too much. Adaptations were also more likely to have been implemented in the educational setting [82% ( n = 11)] as compared with 62% ( n = 16) in the home. Eighty‐three per cent ( n = 43) of respondents reported that low vision aids were used at either home or school on at least a weekly basis.