Premium
Effects of task lighting on visual function in age‐related macular degeneration
Author(s) -
Haymes Sharon A.,
Lee Jenny
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
ophthalmic and physiological optics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.147
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1475-1313
pISSN - 0275-5408
DOI - 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00367.x
Subject(s) - illuminance , macular degeneration , contrast (vision) , incandescent light bulb , visual acuity , audiology , ophthalmology , medicine , optometry , daylight , optics , computer science , computer vision , physics
The purpose was to investigate the effects of the spectral power distribution (SPD) and illuminance of task lighting on visual function in age‐related macular degeneration (ARMD) compared to normal healthy eyes. Twenty‐eight subjects with ARMD and 18 age‐matched normal subjects were studied. The effects on visual function were determined for four common task light sources: standard pearl coat incandescent (SP), daylight blue incandescent (DL), warm white fluorescent (WW) and cool white fluorescent (CW). Apart from a small, statistically significant improvement in contrast sensitivity with DL compared to SP lighting (0.5 dB, p = 0.01), there were no significant effects of SPD on other visual functions and no differences in the effects for subjects with ARMD and those with normal vision. Thus, for task lighting typically used in low vision rehabilitation, the SPD would seem to be of minimal clinical importance to visual function. However, increasing the task illuminance had a greater effect on visual function, in particular for subjects with ARMD ( p < 0.01). For an increase in illuminance from 300 to 3000 lux, the mean increase in contrast sensitivity and near visual acuity was 1.5 dB and 0.13 log MAR, respectively. Although this effect is not large, we suggest that it is clinically relevant and supports the provision of additional task illuminance as an important part of low vision rehabilitation for patients with ARMD.