Premium
Prognostic value of FEV1/FEV6 in elderly people *
Author(s) -
Sorino Claudio,
Sherrill Duane,
Guerra Stefano,
Enright Paul,
Pedone Claudio,
Augugliaro Giuseppe,
Scichilone Nicola,
Battaglia Salvatore,
AntonelliIncalzi Raffaele,
Bellia Vincenzo
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
clinical physiology and functional imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.608
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1475-097X
pISSN - 1475-0961
DOI - 10.1111/j.1475-097x.2010.00984.x
Subject(s) - medicine , spirometry , vital capacity , hazard ratio , cardiology , confidence interval , population , lung function , asthma , lung , diffusing capacity , environmental health
Summary Background: The ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s and forced expiratory volume in 6 s (FEV1/FEV6) has been proposed as an alternative for FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) to diagnose obstructive diseases with less effort during spirometry; however, its prognostic value is unknown. We evaluated whether FEV1/FEV6 is a significant predictor of mortality in elderly subjects and compared its prognostic value with that of FEV1/FVC and FEV1. Methods: One thousand nine hundred and seventy‐one subjects, aged >65 years, participated in the population‐based SA.R.A. study. During the baseline exam, a multidimensional assessment included spirometry. Vital status was determined during 6 years of follow‐up. Association of all‐cause, cardio‐pulmonary (CP) and non‐CP mortality with a low FEV1/FEV6, FEV1/FVC and FEV1 was evaluated. Results: Among subjects with both survival data and acceptable spirometry including FEV6, all‐cause unadjusted mortality rates were 7·00 and 2·46 per 100 person‐years in subjects with FEV1/FEV6 less than and greater than or equal to lower limit of normal (LLN), respectively (mortality rate ratio: 2·84, 95%CI: 2·12–3·84). After adjustment for age, gender, FVC, smoke exposure and main comorbidities, the risk of all‐cause mortality remained significantly increased in subjects with FEV1/FEV6 < LLN [hazard ratio (HR): 1·87, 95%CI: 1·35–2·58] as well as in subjects with FEV1/FVC < LLN (HR: 2·01, 95%CI: 1·51–2·90) and FEV1 < LLN (HR: 2·17, 95%CI: 1·32–3·57). Similar results were found for CP mortality, but not for non‐CP mortality. Conclusions: A low FEV1/FEV6 is a significant predictor of mortality in older individuals. Its prognostic value is comparable to that of a low FEV1/FVC and FEV1.