Premium
Test–retest reliability for two indices of ventilatory efficiency measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing in healthy men and women
Author(s) -
Davis James A.,
Sorrentino Kristin M.,
Ninness Erin M.,
Pham Patrick H.,
Dorado Silvia,
Costello Kara B.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
clinical physiology and functional imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.608
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1475-097X
pISSN - 1475-0961
DOI - 10.1111/j.1475-097x.2006.00674.x
Subject(s) - medicine , cycle ergometer , ventilation (architecture) , ventilatory threshold , respiratory minute volume , cardiopulmonary exercise test , reliability (semiconductor) , vo2 max , limits of agreement , correlation coefficient , incremental exercise , respiratory exchange ratio , correlation , linear regression , cardiology , respiratory system , statistics , mathematics , heart rate , nuclear medicine , blood pressure , mechanical engineering , power (physics) , physics , geometry , quantum mechanics , engineering
Summary The level of ventilation ( E ) at a given carbon dioxide output (CO 2 ) determines ventilatory efficiency. During cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), ventilatory efficiency can be measured as the slope of the E versus CO 2 relationship or the lowest /CO 2 . We evaluated the test–retest reliability of these two ventilatory efficiency indices in 29 healthy subjects (14 males). Each subject performed duplicate cycle ergometer tests on different days. Ventilation and the gas fractions for oxygen and CO 2 were measured with a Vacumed metabolic cart. Linear regression analysis of the versus CO 2 slope for the duplicate tests in the males, females, and both sexes combined yielded correlation coefficients of 0·822, 0·942, and 0·910, respectively. The corresponding correlation coefficients for the lowest /CO 2 were 0·745, 0·929, and 0·884. A comparison of the test–retest correlation coefficients between the two ventilatory efficiency measures for the men, women, and both sexes combined revealed that they were not significantly different and, for a given index, there were no sex differences. The bias (mean of difference scores between tests) and 95% limits of agreement for the versus CO 2 slope in the males, females, and both sexes combined were −0·05 ± 2·41, −0·57 ± 1·92, and −0·32 ± 2·20, respectively. The bias and 95% limits of agreement for the lowest /CO 2 were very similar with values of 0·06 ± 2·45, −0·22 ± 2·03, and −0·10 ± 2·27. We conclude that the test–retest reliability for the versus CO 2 slope and the lowest /CO 2 is the same and that there is no sex difference in reliability for either index of ventilatory efficiency.