Premium
AGONISTIC AND SPACING BEHAVIOUR OF THE NOISY MINER MANORINA MELANOCEPHALA , A COMMUNALLY BREEDING HONEYEATER
Author(s) -
DOW DOUGLAS D.
Publication year - 1979
Publication title -
ibis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.933
H-Index - 80
eISSN - 1474-919X
pISSN - 0019-1019
DOI - 10.1111/j.1474-919x.1979.tb06683.x
Subject(s) - agonistic behaviour , aggression , nest (protein structural motif) , biology , seasonal breeder , predation , ecology , zoology , demography , psychology , social psychology , biochemistry , sociology
SUMMARY The Noisy Miner is a communally breeding Australian honeyeater in which several males feed the offspring of a single female. They reside year‐round in colonies, which may number several hundred birds. Miners within colonies unite to mob predators and are successful in defending their colony area against all other species of birds. The species is also highly aggressive intraspecifically. Individuals in a colony in southeastern Queensland were present most of the time in small activity spaces. Most resident males showed extensive overlap of activity space from one season to the next. Males did not defend their activity spaces, so that coalitions of birds occurred whose membership changed with place and time. Certain assemblages of males, termed coteries, were of a more permanent nature. Coterie members showed aggression towards outsiders at border regions. Females' activity spaces were much smaller and less variable than those of males. They showed almost no overlap and were probably maintained by mutual avoidance. Females tended to nest within the activity space they occupied shortly before the breeding period. Thus the spacing of males and females within a colony was quite different. Interactions, often agonistic, were frequent between individuals, between an individual and a group, and between groups. Encounters involving two males in which participants normally lived farther apart were more often agonistic than when participants lived more closely, and more aggression was seen within coteries than between them. When larger groups of birds had agonistic encounters, they more frequently involved birds from different coteries. Very little male‐female aggression was seen. Interactions between males and females of different coteries were usually sexual, sometimes involving attempted copulation. Colony sizes are probably too large to permit individual recognition of fellow members, but this could be more likely in coteries. Many males in coteries are doubtless closely related, but outsiders frequently infiltrate them. Coteries are not reproductive units.