z-logo
Premium
Relations between open‐field, elevated plus‐maze, and emergence tests in C57BL/6J and BALB/c mice injected with GABA‐ and 5HT‐anxiolytic agents
Author(s) -
Lalonde Robert,
Strazielle Catherine
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
fundamental and clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.655
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1472-8206
pISSN - 0767-3981
DOI - 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2009.00772.x
Subject(s) - chlordiazepoxide , open field , elevated plus maze , buspirone , anxiolytic , benzodiazepine , 5 ht receptor , gabaa receptor , pharmacology , agonist , psychology , receptor , medicine , serotonin , endocrinology , diazepam , anxiety , psychiatry
Two 5HT 1A receptor agonists and chlordiazepoxide were examined in open‐field, elevated plus maze, and emergence tests. At doses with no effect in the open‐field, chlordiazepoxide increased open and open/total arm visits as well as open arm duration in the elevated plus maze, whereas 5HT 1A receptor agonists showed an anxiolytic response on a single measure. The anxiolytic action of chlordiazepoxide was limited to the less active BALB/c strain. Unlike the 5HT 1A receptor agonists, chlordiazepoxide was also anxiolytic in the emergence test, once again only in BALB/c and not C57BL/6J mice. Significant correlations were found between emergence latencies and specific indicators of anxiety in the elevated plus‐maze in chlordiazepoxide‐treated but not in mice treated with buspirone and 8‐OH‐DPAT. These results indicate that elevated plus‐maze and emergence tests depend on benzodiazepine receptors. In contrast, 5HT 1A receptor agonists were ineffective in the emergence test and no correlation was found between emergence latencies and specific indicators of anxiety in the elevated plus‐maze. Though superficially similar, the emergence test seems to tap into a partially separate facet of anxiety.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here