Premium
A comparative pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of conventional and sustained‐release preparations of acebutolol in healthy volunteers
Author(s) -
Fleurot O.,
Lecocq B.,
Lecocq V.,
Liboux A.,
Montay G.,
Frydman A.,
Jaillon P.
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
fundamental and clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.655
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1472-8206
pISSN - 0767-3981
DOI - 10.1111/j.1472-8206.1991.tb00749.x
Subject(s) - acebutolol , pharmacokinetics , pharmacodynamics , blood pressure , pharmacology , dose–response relationship , antiarrhythmic agent , blockade , medicine , anesthesia , heart disease , receptor
Summary— Pharmacokinetics and the degree of β‐blockade of sustained release (SR) acebutolol (500 mg/day) and conventional acebutolol (200 mg tid) were examined after the first oral dose and after 10 days of treatment in ten healthy volunteers. After the first dose, acebutolol C max did not significantly differ between the two formulations; however, on day 10 acebutolol C max was significantly higher after SR formulation. C max of diacetolol, the major metabolite, did not differ between SR and conventional acebutolol neither on day 1 nor on day 10. The dose‐corrected relative bio‐availability of acebutolol was not different from 100% on day 1 and day 10; however the dose‐corrected diacetolol AUC, SR/conventional ratio, was significantly lower than 100% on days 1 and 10. Both acebutolol preparations exerted a significant reduction in exercise tachycardia over 24 h on day 1 and day 10; however, conventional acebutolol exhibited a greater reduction 24 h after the first dose. Exercise‐induced increase in systolic blood pressure was similarly inhibited by both treatments except for 24 h after the first dose when systolic blood pressure was significantly higher with SR than with conventional acebutolol. The percent reduction in heart rate during exercise was linearly correlated with log acebutolol plasma concentrations for each treatment regimen. These results suggest that β‐blockade exerted by SR acebutolol in healthy volunteers is equivalent to that of conventional acebutolol.