z-logo
Premium
Effect of 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate on Streptococcus spp. biofilms
Author(s) -
D’Ercole S.,
Di Giulio M.,
Grande R.,
Di Campli E.,
Di Bartolomeo S.,
Piccolomini R.,
Cellini L.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
letters in applied microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.698
H-Index - 110
eISSN - 1472-765X
pISSN - 0266-8254
DOI - 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2010.02985.x
Subject(s) - streptococcus mitis , biofilm , streptococcus oralis , streptococcus mutans , microbiology and biotechnology , bacteria , streptococcus , adhesion , chemistry , streptococcaceae , population , biology , medicine , antibiotics , genetics , environmental health , organic chemistry
Aims:  The effect of different concentrations of 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) was evaluated on biofilm formation and preformed biofilm of Streptococcus mitis , Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus oralis , alone or combined to each other. Methods and Results:  Twofold serial dilution of HEMA ranged from 12 to 0·75 mmol l −1 was added to Streptococcal broth cultures and mature biofilms in 96‐well‐microtitre plates to evaluate bacterial biomass and cell viability. HEMA affected the Streptococcal population in a strain‐specific way producing few significant effects. A reduction on biofilm formation and a detachment of preformed biofilm was recorded in Strep. mitis ATCC 6249, whereas in mixed cultures, the monomer expressed a general aggregative effect on mature biofilms. A reduction in cell viability was also recorded in an HEMA‐concentration‐dependent way in each experimental condition studied. Conclusions:  These results suggest that the HEMA prevalent effects are both the reduction of bacterial adhesion to a polystyrene surface and the increase in dead cells also characterized by an aggregative status. Significance and Impact of the Study:  Understanding the potential effect of HEMA, released from resin‐based materials, on oral bacteria may furnish information for surveillance of the risk reduction in secondary caries via hindering biofilm generation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here