z-logo
Premium
The effects of two synthetic putrescine analogues on germination and appressorium formation by uredospores of Uromyces viciae‐fabae on artificial membranes
Author(s) -
Reitz M.,
Walters D.R.,
Moerschbacher B.,
Robins D.J.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
letters in applied microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.698
H-Index - 110
eISSN - 1472-765X
pISSN - 0266-8254
DOI - 10.1111/j.1472-765x.1995.tb01061.x
Subject(s) - appressorium , putrescine , library science , germination , chemistry , biology , botany , computer science , organic chemistry , enzyme
M. REITZ, D.R. WALTERS, B. MOERSCHBACHER AND D.J. ROBINS. 1995. An examination was made of the effects of two synthetic putrescine analogues, ( E )‐1,4‐diaminobut‐2‐ene (E‐BED) and ( E )‐( N, N, N, N ‐tetraethyl)‐1,4‐diaminobut‐2‐ene (E‐TED), on germination and appressorium formation by uredospores of the rust fungus Uromyces viciaefabae on artificial membranes. E‐BED reduced germination by just 11% at 0.1 mmol 1 ‐1 and by 24% at 1 mmol 1 ‐1 , while appressorium formation was reduced by 37% at 0.05 mmol 1 ‐1 and was completely prevented at 1 mmol 1 ‐1 E‐BED. The E‐BED derivative E‐TED reduced uredospore germination by 45% at 0.05 mmol 1 ‐1 , while no appressoria were formed when uredospores were exposed to 0.05 mmol 1 ‐1 E‐TED. These results support previous suggestions that E‐BED and E‐TED exert their main effect on fungal development on the leaf surface.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here