z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Adoption, use and perception of Australian acacias around the world
Author(s) -
Kull Christian A.,
Shackleton Charlie M.,
Cunningham Peter J.,
Ducatillon Catherine,
DufourDror JeanMarc,
Esler Karen J.,
Friday James B.,
Gouveia António C.,
Griffin A. R.,
Marchante Elizabete,
Midgley Stephen J.,
Pauchard Aníbal,
Rangan Haripriya,
Richardson David M.,
Rinaudo Tony,
Tassin Jacques,
Urgenson Lauren S.,
von Maltitz Graham P.,
Zenni Rafael D.,
Zylstra Matthew J.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
diversity and distributions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.918
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1472-4642
pISSN - 1366-9516
DOI - 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00783.x
Subject(s) - geography , context (archaeology) , acacia , ecosystem services , scale (ratio) , agroforestry , socioeconomics , economic growth , ecology , ecosystem , sociology , cartography , economics , biology , archaeology
Aim  To examine the different uses and perceptions of introduced Australian acacias (wattles; Acacia subgenus Phyllodineae ) by rural households and communities. Location  Eighteen landscape‐scale case studies around the world, in Vietnam, India, Réunion, Madagascar, South Africa, Congo, Niger, Ethiopia, Israel, France, Portugal, Brazil, Chile, Dominican Republic and Hawai‘i. Methods  Qualitative comparison of case studies, based on questionnaire sent to network of acacia researchers. Information based on individual knowledge of local experts, published and unpublished sources. Results  We propose a conceptual model to explain current uses and perceptions of introduced acacias. It highlights historically and geographically contingent processes, including economic development, environmental discourses, political context, and local or regional needs. Four main groupings of case studies were united by similar patterns: (1) poor communities benefiting from targeted agroforestry projects; (2) places where residents, generally poor, take advantage of a valuable resource already present in their landscape via plantation and/or invasion; (3) regions of small and mid‐scale tree farmers participating in the forestry industry; and (4) a number of high‐income communities dealing with the legacies of former or niche use of introduced acacia in a context of increased concern over biodiversity and ecosystem services. Main conclusions  Economic conditions play a key role shaping acacia use. Poorer communities rely strongly on acacias (often in, or escaped from, formal plantations) for household needs and, sometimes, for income. Middle‐income regions more typically host private farm investments in acacia woodlots for commercialization. Efforts at control of invasive acacias must take care to not adversely impact poor dependent communities.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here