z-logo
Premium
Non‐charged amino acids from three different domains contribute to link agonist binding to channel gating in α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors
Author(s) -
Aldea Marcos,
Mulet José,
Sala Salvador,
Sala Francisco,
Criado Manuel
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of neurochemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.75
H-Index - 229
eISSN - 1471-4159
pISSN - 0022-3042
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04771.x
Subject(s) - gating , agonist , nicotinic agonist , biophysics , acetylcholine receptor , receptor , mutant , alpha 4 beta 2 nicotinic receptor , chemistry , amino acid , binding site , acetylcholine , biochemistry , nicotinic acetylcholine receptor , biology , pharmacology , gene
Binding of agonists to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors results in channel opening. Previously, we have shown that several charged residues at three different domains of the α7 nicotinic receptor are involved in coupling binding and gating, probably through a network of electrostatic interactions. This network, however, could also be integrated by other residues. To test this hypothesis, non‐charged amino acids were mutated and expression levels and electrophysiological responses of mutant receptors were determined. Mutants at positions Asn47 and Gln48 (loop 2), Ile130, Trp134, and Gln140 (loop 7), and Thr264 (M2–M3 linker) showed poor or null functional responses, despite significant membrane expression. By contrast, mutants F137A and S265A exhibited a gain of function effect. In all cases, changes in dose–response relationships were small, EC 50 values being between threefold smaller and fivefold larger, arguing against large modifications of agonist binding. Peak currents decayed at the same rate in all receptors except two, excluding large effects on desensitization. Thus, the observed changes could be mostly caused by alterations of the gating characteristics. Moreover, analysis of double mutants showed an interconnection between some residues in these domains, especially Gln48 with Ile130, suggesting a potential coupling between agonist binding and channel gating through these amino acids.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here