Premium
PHOSPHOINOSITIDES AND OTHER PHOSPHOLIPIDS IN SYMPATHETIC GANGLIA AND NERVE TRUNKS OF RATS
Author(s) -
White G. L.,
Larrabee M. G.
Publication year - 1973
Publication title -
journal of neurochemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.75
H-Index - 229
eISSN - 1471-4159
pISSN - 0022-3042
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1973.tb00039.x
Subject(s) - labelling , superior cervical ganglion , cervical ganglia , stimulation , chemistry , inositol , vagus nerve , endocrinology , incubation , phosphatidylinositol , medicine , phosphatidylcholine , phosphatidylethanolamine , biology , biochemistry , phospholipid , receptor , membrane , kinase
— Paired vagus nerves, phrenic nerves or superior cervical sympathetic ganglia from adult white rats were incubated for 4 h at 37°C in a bicarbonate‐buffered physiological solution containing glucose and 32 P 1 . At the end of incubation triphosphoinositide (TPI) contained more 32 P than any other lipid in the vagus nerves and was second only to phosphatidylcholine (PC) in the phrenic nerves. In the sympathetic ganglia phosphatidylinositol (PI) contained more 32 P than did TPI, but both had less than PC. Conducted nerve impulses, initiated by electrical stimulation during the final 3 h of incubation, caused a highly significant increase in the [32P]‐labelling of PI in ganglia (as previously reported) probably decreased the labelling of TPI in the vagus nerves, and decreased the labelling of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) in the ganglia. Addition to the incubation medium of §‐ or γ‐hexachlorocyclohexane (analogs of inositol) reversibly blocked transmission through the sympathetic ganglia at concentrations less than 0·1 mM. The §‐isomer also blocked conduction along axons at similar concentrations; only the γ‐isomer (lindane) exerted a selective effect on synaptic transmission. In the ganglia, the §‐isomer increased the [ 32 P]‐labelling of PI and diphosphoinositide (DPI) relative to that of PC. The γ‐isomer did not affect the relative labelling of PI in the ganglia, whereas it decreased that of TPI, but only at relatively high concentrations. Thus, various affects of the hexachlorocyclohexanes were not explicable by assuming that they acted as analog inhibitors of inositol metabolism. In the ganglia, the hexachlorocyclohexanes reduced the effect of neuronal activity on the labelling of PI in proportion to the extent by which they blocked transmission. This metabolic effect was therefore presumed to be secondary to a ganglionic blocking action.