Premium
A survey of the information management and technology training needs of doctors in an acute NHS trust in the United Kingdom
Author(s) -
Devitt Nicola,
Murphy Jeannette
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
health information and libraries journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.779
H-Index - 38
eISSN - 1471-1842
pISSN - 1471-1834
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2004.00492.x
Subject(s) - health informatics , informatics , computer literacy , medicine , medical education , health care , work (physics) , population , nursing , family medicine , public health , computer science , world wide web , mechanical engineering , electrical engineering , environmental health , engineering , economics , economic growth
Background: Doctors need information skills to deliver health care in the 21st century. There is concern that those who trained before the ‘information age’ will be inadequately equipped for their work. Objectives: To assess doctors’ use of computers for clinical tasks, and their knowledge and skills in health information management and technology. Design: Questionnaire survey. Setting: An acute NHS trust in the UK. Participants: 96 (83%) of all doctors in the trust responded. Main outcome measures: Proportion of respondents reporting the following: use of computer‐based systems for clinical tasks, knowledge in eight health informatics topics, skills in using specific hardware and software applications. Also comparison of reported skills between senior and junior staff; proportion of doctors identifying specific training needs. Results: All but one (1%) of the responding doctors used a computer regularly. Over three quarters of respondents reported they were semi‐skilled or fully skilled in basic office applications, though the juniors scored significantly more highly than the seniors for some applications. However, 44% of doctors reported no skills in database software, identifying this as a training need. Around half of the doctors were unaware of health informatics topics, including electronic patient records, the Caldicott report and data protection law. In each case the senior doctors were significantly more aware than the juniors of the topic in question. Conclusion: Both junior and senior doctors have basic computer literacy, but nearly half of this population identify the use of database software as a training need. In addition, there are several health informatics topics of which a large proportion of doctors, particularly the juniors, have little knowledge, but which have not been identified as training needs. Some recommendations are made for provision of in‐house health informatics education for doctors. Key Messages Implications for Policy• Junior doctors need education about electronic health records and data protection. • Senior doctors are in a good position to include such health informatics training in regular post graduate education meetings.Implications for Practice• Most doctors have acquired basic computer skills by self‐directed learning: there appears to be no need for catch‐up training for senior doctors who graduated before the computer age.