Premium
The prevalence of urinary incontinence in pregnancy among a multi‐ethnic population resident in Norway
Author(s) -
Bø K,
Pauck Øglund G,
Sletner L,
Mørkrid K,
Jenum AK
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03435.x
Subject(s) - ethnic group , urinary incontinence , pregnancy , medicine , obstetrics , population , urinary system , gynecology , demography , urology , environmental health , biology , sociology , anthropology , genetics
Please cite this paper as: Bø K, Pauck Øglund G, Sletner L, Mørkrid K, Jenum A. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in pregnancy among a multi‐ethnic population resident in Norway. BJOG 2012;119:1354–1360. Objectives To investigate prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) in a multi‐ethnic population of pregnant women, and to analyse for possible associations of the known risk factors for UI in such a population. Design Population‐based cross‐sectional study. Setting All pregnant women in three administrative city districts attending the Child Health Clinics. Population and sample Out of 823 women identified in first trimester, 722 (74%) agreed to participate in the study at 28 weeks of gestation. Inclusion criteria were: healthy women at 20 weeks of gestation or less and able to communicate in Norwegian, Arabic, English, Sorani, Somali, Tamil, Turkish, Urdu or Vietnamese. Methods Differences between ethnic groups were tested by simple descriptive statistics. Associations were estimated by logistic regression analysis and presented as crude (cOR) and adjusted (aOR) odds ratios. Main outcome measures Prevalence of UI as ascertained using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire—urinary incontinence—short form. Results Prevalence rates of UI at 28 weeks of gestation were 26% for women of African origin, 36% for women of Middle Eastern origin, 40% for women of East Asian origin, 43% for women of South Asian origin and 45% for women of European/North American origin. The difference was significant between women of African and European/North American origins ( P = 0.011) and between women of African and South Asian origins ( P = 0.035). Age (aOR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01–1.09) and parity (aOR 2.34; 95% CI 1.66–3.28) were positively associated with the prevalence of UI in pregnancy. Women of African origin had significantly reduced odds for UI (aOR 0.42; 95% CI 0.20–0.87). East Asian and African women reported the highest perceived impact of UI in pregnancy. Conclusions A high prevalence of UI was found in a multi‐ethnic pregnant population.