Premium
The plasma levels of the endocannabinoid, anandamide, increase with the induction of labour
Author(s) -
Nallendran V,
Lam PMW,
Marczylo TH,
Bankart MJG,
Taylor AH,
Taylor DJ,
Konje JC
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02555.x
Subject(s) - anandamide , medicine , endocrinology , endocannabinoid system , cannabinoid , population , chemistry , cannabinoid receptor , receptor , antagonist , environmental health
Please cite this paper as: Nallendran V, Lam P, Marczylo T, Bankart M, Taylor A, Taylor D, Konje J. The plasma levels of the endocannabinoid, anandamide, increase with the induction of labour. BJOG 2010;117:863–869. Objective Plasma anandamide (AEA) levels have previously been shown to be elevated in labour and defective cannabinoid receptor type 1 signalling in mice has been shown to be associated with elevation of corticotrophin‐releasing hormone and spontaneous onset of preterm labour. We measured plasma AEA levels in women undergoing induction of labour to define the changes during the transition from the nonlabouring to labouring state. Design A longitudinal observational study. Setting A large UK teaching hospital. Population Term pregnant women undergoing induction of labour. Methods Blood was collected from women before induction of labour and again when they were in active labour. Plasma AEA was extracted and measured using ultraperformance liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry. Main outcome measures The primary outcome variable was change in plasma AEA levels from the nonlabouring to the labouring state. The secondary outcome was induction‐to‐delivery interval. Results There was a 1.5‐fold increase in mean plasma AEA levels from 1.20 ± 0.57 n m in the nonlabouring state to 1.82 ± 0.87 n m in the labouring state ( P < 0.0001). Induction‐to‐delivery interval was predicted by both Bishop’s score ( P < 0.0001) and percentage change in plasma AEA levels ( P < 0.0001). There was a negative correlation between the percentage change in plasma AEA level and the induction‐to‐delivery interval ( r = – 0.28; P = 0.0481). This means that the greater the rise in the plasma AEA levels the shorter the duration of labour. Conclusions Plasma AEA levels increase with active labour and the negative correlations between percentage change in plasma AEA levels and induction‐to‐delivery interval suggest that AEA is likely to be involved in the physiological mechanisms of labour. Whether this increase is essential for myometrial contraction is unclear and needs further investigation.