Premium
Quality of care for maternal and newborn health: the neglected agenda
Author(s) -
van den Broek NR,
Graham WJ
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02333.x
Subject(s) - quality (philosophy) , psychological intervention , millennium development goals , audit , medicine , health care , quality management , nursing , developing country , environmental health , psychology , business , economic growth , economics , marketing , philosophy , accounting , epistemology , service (business)
The quality of care received by mothers and babies in developing countries is often reported as poor. Yet efforts to address this contributory factor to maternal and newborn mortality have received less attention compared with barriers of access to care. The current heightened concern to achieve Millennium Development Goals 4 & 5 has illuminated the neglected quality agenda. Whilst there is no universally‐accepted definition of “quality care”, it is widely acknowledged to embrace multiple levels – from patient to health system, and multiple dimensions, including safety as well as efficiency. Quality care should thus lie at the core of all strategies for accelerating progress towards MDG4 &5. Interventions to measure and improve quality need themselves to be evidence‐based. Two promising approaches are maternal and perinatal death reviews and criterion‐based audit. These and other quality improvement tools have a crucial role to play in the implementation of effective maternal and newborn care.