z-logo
Premium
Surgery for menorrhagia within English regions: variation in rates of endometrial ablation and hysterectomy
Author(s) -
Cromwell DA,
Mahmood TA,
Templeton A,
van der Meulen JH
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02284.x
Subject(s) - medicine , hysterectomy , endometrial ablation , poisson regression , general surgery , surgery , gynecology , population , environmental health
Objective  To examine variation between English regions in the use of surgery (endometrial ablation or hysterectomy) for the treatment of menorrhagia. Design  Analysis of Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) data to produce rates of surgery for English Strategic Health Authorities (SHAs) and Primary Care Trusts (PCTs). Population  Women aged between 25 and 59 years who had endometrial ablation or hysterectomy for menorrhagia between April 2003 and March 2006 in English NHS hospitals. Methods  Multilevel Poisson regression was used to determine the level of systematic variation in the regional rates of surgery and their association with regional characteristics (deprivation, service provision and mix of surgical procedures). Main outcome measure  Age‐standardised annual rates of surgery. Results  The English rate of surgery for menorrhagia was 143 procedures per 100 000 women. Surgical rates within SHAs ranged from 52 to 230 procedures per 100 000 women, while rates within PCTs ranged from 20 to 420 procedures per 100 000 women. While, 60% of all procedures were endometrial ablations, the proportion across SHAs varied, ranging from 46% to 75%. Surgery rates were associated with the regional characteristics, but only weakly, and risk adjustment reduced the amount of unexplained variation by <15% at both SHA and PCT levels. Conclusion  Regional differences in surgical rates for menorrhagia have persisted despite changes in practice and improved evidence, suggesting there is scope for improving the management of menorrhagia within England.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here