z-logo
Premium
Policies for manual removal of placenta at vaginal delivery: variations in timing within Europe
Author(s) -
DeneuxTharaux C,
Macfarlane A,
Winter C,
Zhang WH,
Alexander S,
BouvierColle MH
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01996.x
Subject(s) - vaginal delivery , placenta , obstetrics , medicine , postpartum haemorrhage , intervention (counseling) , maternal morbidity , third stage , gynecology , pregnancy , nursing , fetus , biology , geography , genetics , training (meteorology) , meteorology
The length of the third stage of labour is a potential modifiable risk factor for postpartum haemorrhage at vaginal delivery, but there is no definitive evidence that early intervention to remove the placenta manually will prevent postpartum haemorrhage. We report a wide variation between countries in Europe in policies about the timing of manual removal of placenta. Two groups of countries with clearly divergent policies were identified. A randomised controlled trial is needed to provide definitive evidence on the risks and benefits of manual removal of placenta at different timings after vaginal delivery.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here