Premium
Variations in policies for management of the third stage of labour and the immediate management of postpartum haemorrhage in Europe
Author(s) -
Winter C,
Macfarlane A,
DeneuxTharaux C,
Zhang WH,
Alexander S,
Brocklehurst P,
BouvierColle MH,
Prendiville W,
Cararach V,
Van Roosmalen J,
Berbik I,
Klein M,
AyresdeCampos D,
Erkkola R,
Chiechi LM,
LanghoffRoos J,
StrayPedersen B,
Troeger C
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01377.x
Subject(s) - third stage , postpartum haemorrhage , medicine , business , obstetrics , pregnancy , operations management , nursing , geography , economics , training (meteorology) , biology , meteorology , genetics
Background The EUropean Project on obstetric Haemorrhage Reduction: Attitudes, Trial, and Early warning System (EUPHRATES) is a set of five linked projects, the first component of which was a survey of policies for management of the third stage of labour and immediate management of postpartum haemorrhage following vaginal birth in Europe. Objectives The objectives were to ascertain and compare policies for management of the third stage of labour and immediate management of postpartum haemorrhage in maternity units in Europe following vaginal birth. Design Survey of policies. Setting The project was a European collaboration, with participants in 14 European countries. Sample All maternity units in 12 countries and in selected regions of two countries in Europe. Methods A postal questionnaire was sent to all or a defined sample of maternity units in each participating country. Main outcome measures Stated policies for management of the third stage of labour and the immediate management of postpartum haemorrhage. Results Policies of using uterotonics for the management of the third stage were widespread, but policies about agents, timing, clamping and cutting the umbilical cord and the use of controlled cord traction differed widely. For immediate management of postpartum haemorrhage, policies of massaging the uterus were widespread. Policies of catheterising the bladder, bimanual compression and in the choice of drugs administered were much more variable. Conclusions Considerable variations were observed between and within countries in policies for management of the third stage of labour. Variations were observed, but to a lesser extent, in policies for the immediate management of postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth. In both cases, policies about the pharmacological agents to be used varied widely.