z-logo
Premium
Direct imaging of the pelvic floor muscles using two‐dimensional ultrasound: a comparison of women with urogenital prolapse versus controls
Author(s) -
Athanasiou S,
Chaliha C,
ToozsHobson P,
Salvatore S,
Khullar V,
Cardozo L
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01322.x
Subject(s) - medicine , pelvic floor , levator ani , echogenicity , ultrasound , genitourinary system , prospective cohort study , reproducibility , urology , gynecology , surgery , radiology , anatomy , statistics , mathematics
Objective  To evaluate the anatomy of the levator ani muscle in women with urogenital prolapse versus matched controls without prolapse using real‐time two‐dimensional (2‐D) ultrasound. Design  Prospective observational study. Setting  Tertiary referral urogynaecology unit. Population  Forty‐three women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and 24 women (controls) attending a gynaecology clinic without prolapse. Methods  All participants completed a standardised symptom questionnaire. Main outcome measures  The morphology of the vagina and paravaginal tissue was recorded at different levels. The thickness of the levator ani and the hiatal area were measured at rest. Reproducibility of the method was assessed by repeated measurements to assess intra‐observer variability and inter‐observer variability. Results  This method showed good intra‐observer and inter‐observer reproducibility and reliability. In controls, the pubococcygeus muscle showed more regular echogenicity with no evidence of trauma, whereas in women with prolapse the muscle had mixed echogenicity. ( P = 0.002). The mean thickness of the pubococcygeus did not differ between groups. The levator hiatal area was significantly larger in women with pelvic floor prolapse versus controls (17.8 cm 2 versus 13.5 cm 2 , P < 0.001). This increase in hiatal area positively and significantly correlated with prolapse severity ( P < 0.001). Conclusions  Morphology and hiatal area can be reliably imaged using 2‐D ultrasound. Prolapse was related to changes in pelvic floor morphology and increased levator hiatal area. The use of 2‐D ultrasound provides an important insight into the pathophysiology of prolapse.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here